lumpenproletariat@quokk.au to Flippanarchy@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish · 6 days agocrime is a spookquokk.auimagemessage-square102linkfedilinkarrow-up1901arrow-down15
arrow-up1896arrow-down1imagecrime is a spookquokk.aulumpenproletariat@quokk.au to Flippanarchy@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish · 6 days agomessage-square102linkfedilink
minus-squarecommie@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down4·5 days agostraight up mott and bailey. retreat from your specific, unjustified claim to one very broad and easy to defend.
minus-squareMinnesotaGoddam@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up4arrow-down1·5 days agosorry, but you’re committing the fallacy fallacy and i don’t debate people who do that bullshit
minus-squarecommie@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down4·5 days ago you’re committing the fallacy fallacy wrong, but you just did.
minus-squareMinnesotaGoddam@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down1·5 days agolet us spout the names of fallacies instead of talking, that is productive. that’s you.
minus-squarecommie@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down2·5 days agoanother appeal to ridicule, but no evidence that money or government are inevitabilities.
minus-squarecommie@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down2·5 days agoi explicitly said i don’t want a debate.
minus-squareMinnesotaGoddam@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down1·5 days agoyet you keep demanding i provide logic and evidence. what is that but demanding a debate? do you really think everyone here is that stupid?
minus-squarecommie@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down2·5 days agoi am not demanding anything. i’m pointing out that you literally made up your claim, and rather than even try to support it, you play rhetorical games.
minus-squarecommie@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down3·5 days agoI don’t want debate. I want you to stop making things up and spreading them as fact.
minus-squareMinnesotaGoddam@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down1·5 days agoooo, i get this every time i call out medical practitioners for committing crimes. within hours. which one was it you personally committed?
minus-squarecommie@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down1·5 days agogreat. ad hominem with a red herring. still no evidence for your claim that government and money will pervade every society.
straight up mott and bailey. retreat from your specific, unjustified claim to one very broad and easy to defend.
sorry, but you’re committing the fallacy fallacy and i don’t debate people who do that bullshit
wrong, but you just did.
let us spout the names of fallacies instead of talking, that is productive. that’s you.
another appeal to ridicule, but no evidence that money or government are inevitabilities.
Removed by mod
i explicitly said i don’t want a debate.
yet you keep demanding i provide logic and evidence. what is that but demanding a debate? do you really think everyone here is that stupid?
i am not demanding anything. i’m pointing out that you literally made up your claim, and rather than even try to support it, you play rhetorical games.
I don’t want debate. I want you to stop making things up and spreading them as fact.
ooo, i get this every time i call out medical practitioners for committing crimes. within hours. which one was it you personally committed?
great. ad hominem with a red herring. still no evidence for your claim that government and money will pervade every society.