Using the past to make an informed decision on how to proceed is not making dubious claims about the future. The only one making dubious claims about the future is you. Please explain to me how disolving the state would somehow make vigilante justice more effective, considering that vigilante justice is already outside the purview of the state?
the past isn’t the future
No shit, but looking at past results is how we make informed decisions about literally everything. What the fuck is your point?
they don’t know what a future looks like without the state or capital.
We can cross that bridge when we get there. Until then, using actual data is more useful than wishful thinking.
to be clear, you don’t know the future
No shit. Again, what’s your fucking point? Stop being vague and obtuse and just say what you’re getting at.
any claim about the future is dubious, and theirs to a great degree
Using the past to make an informed decision on how to proceed is not making dubious claims about the future. The only one making dubious claims about the future is you. Please explain to me how disolving the state would somehow make vigilante justice more effective, considering that vigilante justice is already outside the purview of the state?
I never said vigilante justice would be more effective. you’re arguing with a strawman.