cross-posted from: https://lemmy.dbzer0.com/post/63691775
Posted this in Fediverse Memes but got deleted for some reason, can’t imagine why.
cross-posted from: https://lemmy.dbzer0.com/post/63691775
Posted this in Fediverse Memes but got deleted for some reason, can’t imagine why.
Based
This user is suspected to have relations to Russo-Chinese state media and Marxist sympathies, please report any suspicious behavior to https://cia.gov/
@AntiBullyRanger@ani.social @Flatworm7591@lemmy.dbzer0.com
You said that the possibility of an interpretation of “Death to X” other than yours would be bad faith. But here you can see that this is not the case. Yes, I know this guy is just a sad edgelord. But because everyone knows that this interpretation above also exists, everyone also knows that it is ambiguous. It’s meant to be. Pointing this out is not bad faith, but simply describes why the sentence is also rejected by many on the left.
Why are you tagging me here‽
I disengaged this precisely because you won’t budge on “Death to Genocide, esp. Bibi’s.”
You made that comment with your interpretation, and someone agreed with that sentence on its own. How the fuck does this prove that “Death to X” can be interpreted as killing all people of X?