So you … agree with the post that indigenous people were on the right track before colonization, according to your number goals/analysis, and that eco-fascists are wrong to call all human disease rather than pointing out capitalism ?

But moreover, i’m interested in where you get your numbers from. I’m convinced that being less would make solving problems easier, but i’m also convinced that being less alone would not solve anything and that it cannot be an ethically reliable goal/tool with so much people caring so much about having kids, and most importantly every person with knowledge on the matter told me that we have the capacity to feed all 10B people, so i’m quite intrigued by your take.

My guess is that everything lies in defining “healthy” and “pre-modern civ”. What about modern sustainable-ish agricultural practices ? From what i know, they’re not that far behind conventional production yield-wise.