I get it and am here for the anarchy of it all, but there’s no “no” coming out of the “Would other people be willing…” box, which a capitalist would say is the most important line.
Maybe it should loop back to the “Then capitalism is wasting…” box, since if nobody is willing to create it, is it really valuable enough to exceed creation inertia?
Which is funny because it shows the same logic that you stated by returning to the “Is it valuable” question. So even if you missed it, you still came to the same conclusion which just goes to reinforce the legitimacy of the flowchart.
I get it and am here for the anarchy of it all, but there’s no “no” coming out of the “Would other people be willing…” box, which a capitalist would say is the most important line.
Maybe it should loop back to the “Then capitalism is wasting…” box, since if nobody is willing to create it, is it really valuable enough to exceed creation inertia?
There is a “no”. It loops back to the top.
Haha, oh my god, I looked everywhere and didn’t see it. Leaving my comment as-is as a lasting monument to my cluelessness.
Which is funny because it shows the same logic that you stated by returning to the “Is it valuable” question. So even if you missed it, you still came to the same conclusion which just goes to reinforce the legitimacy of the flowchart.