The Privacy Iceberg

This is original content. AI was not used anywhere except for the bottom right image, simply because I could not find one similar enough to what I needed. This took around 6 hours to make.

Transcription (for the visually impaired)

(I tried my best)

The background is an iceberg with 6 levels, denoting 6 different levels of privacy.

The tip of the iceberg is titled “The Brainwashed” with a quote beside it that says “I have nothing to hide”. The logos depicted in this section are:

The surface section of the iceberg is titled “As seen on TV” with a quote beside it that says “This video is sponsored by…”. The logos depicted in this section are:

An underwater section of the iceberg is titled “The Beginner” with a quote beside it that says “I don’t like hackers and spying”. The logos depicted in this section are:

A lower section of the iceberg is titled “The Privacy Enthusiast” with a quote beside it that says “I have nothing I want to show”. The logos depicted in this section are:

An even lower section of the iceberg is titled “The Privacy Activist” with a quote beside it that says “Privacy is a human right”. The logos depicted in this section are:

The lowest portion of the iceberg is titled “The Ghost”. There is a quote beside it that has been intentionally redacted. The images depicted in this section are:

  • A cancel sign over a mobile phone, symbolizing “no electronics”
  • An illustration of a log cabin, symbolizing “living in a log cabin in the woods”
  • A picture of gold bars, symbolizing “paying only in gold”
  • A picture of a death certificate, symbolizing “faking your own death”
  • An AI generated picture of a person wearing a black hoodie, a baseball cap, a face mask, and reflective sunglasses, symbolizing “hiding ones identity in public”

End of transcription.

  • recklessengagement@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    11 months ago

    I think this is the first time I’ve seen an iceberg meme with sources and explanations for each item. Fantastic. Your work is appreciated.

    • comfy@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      To be honest, and it wouldn’t work here, but I sometime enjoy the cryptic nature of iceberg memes at the lower ranks. It’s like a scavenger hunt.

  • ISOmorph@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    11 months ago

    Can you explain why you would think Steam is so bad? I would argue they’re pretty fair, especially with the option to buy steam cards for cash to not disclose your personal data. Does the client do some unsavory shit?

    • lazynooblet@lazysoci.al
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      Seeing steam at the top makes me question the list. Likely a hate of DRM rather than privacy

      • lb_o@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        11 months ago

        Yeap, and Brave in the middle. They only pretend they are for privacy, but they are the very opposite.

        • dogs0n@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          11 months ago

          Yeah i hate when I see people using Brave, because they have been brainwashed.

          Does anyone remember when they were injecting their own referral links into links for online stores (99% certain they did this pls prove wrong if you know better)? This alone leaves them with 0 trust in my books.

          • const_void@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            11 months ago

            Brave is and always has been gross. Never understood how they’ve been so successful at tricking people into installing it.

            • SirPea@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              11 months ago

              OP replied in another comment its because “firefox is not secure” https://lemmy.dbzer0.com/post/43710170/18564861 :

              […] Chromium-based browsers aren’t all bad, such as Vanadium or Trivalent, so people sometimes feel more comfortable sticking with what seems familiar (coming from Chrome).

              In another reply parents to this one:

              LibreWolf is far from secure, as it is based on Firefox and so comes with the same security issues. If you meant to say privacy and not security, the reason nobody makes high threat model browsers for Windows is because Windows itself is not private and it would be a losing battle.

              So OP is saying it’s not private nor safe? I get what some people are saying of Firefox constantly changing Terms of Services but that’d be in regard to privacy not security and OP tries to argue not being safe which his iceberg also implies in terms of privacy not being good too. Yeah, LibreFox’s ToS isn’t the same as Firefox’s ToS and his counterarguments to Firefox and Firefox-based on replies is Chrome-based browsers exclusive to niche OSes (also OP don’t even try arguing Brave on comments so probably just trying to rage-bait with every opportunity). I’d love OP to argue using the examples he used in the iceberg. So many discourse incosistencies along with the iceberg. Also OP FYI while privacy does not mean secure, lack of privacy could mean security risks in some cases.

        • MajesticElevator@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          They’re not the very opposite. They have done wrong things, just like Mozilla. Doesn’t make them Google though.

  • nossaquesapao@lemmy.eco.br
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    11 months ago

    Funny how you need more and more technical knowledge to go deeper into privacy, until the last level, which is basically giving up on technology itself.

    • wolfinthewoods@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      The last level is living in a cabin in the woods and writing manifestos about industrial society and the ills of technology O_o

  • utopiah@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    On browsers, as you put Chromium then also put Firefox or deMozillaed Firefox e.g. WaterFox.

    I’d put Brave back to the 2nd layer due to relying on Chromium and being heavily marketed while gathering data for its crypto scheme. I’d also put Firefox on the 2nd or 3rd layer.

  • comfy@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    Oh, am I that far gone?

    spoiler

    I don’t see Qubes, Whonix or Tails on there.

  • tisktisk@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    TIL I’m a privacy activist–who can help me get to the ghost mode?
    (Do I even want to get there or is that limited to journalists who have entire states trying to unalive them?)

    • The 8232 Project@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      Do I even want to get there

      Only you can answer that.

      or is that limited to journalists who have entire states trying to unalive them?

      Pretty much, but if you want to give up all technology, work for yourself, and fake your death, then more power to you!

      • jaybone@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        Seems like faking your death would cause more privacy problems than it solves. Why not just “stay alive” with a completely innocuous identity? Then adopt some new identity which cannot be traced back to the original?

  • mmhmm@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    I was at the bike shop a few weeks back and a ghost walked in. He came in wearing a medical mask covered by a bandana, sunglasses, cap. They wore gloves, long sleaved pants and shirt.

    First question from staff, ‘this a robbery?’

    Ghost, ‘no, I just need 27 2.5 tubes, miss.’

    They get the tubes, he agrees. Staff asks if he has an account. Ghost says, “nope, why would I need one?” Staff says they do it for records, insurance claim assist, and discounts. Ghost goes with a John Doe, pays cash and peaces the fuck out.

    Total King, but dude was given up a lot. Half of us were drinking beers enjoying a warm evening in spring. I hope he has had some good rides.

    I can say with confidence thay he was a white male. In his 50s. About 5’10". 140 lbs-ish. If anyone wants to get any tips, good luck!

  • admin@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    The only thing stopping me from being ‘the Activist Group’ is that Mullvad requires payment. Sorry, but I’m running a little tight on budget.

    At the same time, I can’t use Proton VPN for torrenting.

    • The 8232 Project@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      “As seen on TV” does not imply privacy, it just implies a large advertising budget. These are software that market themselves as private (and are sometimes better than nothing at all) but may still be just as bad as software on the tip of the iceberg.

  • iterable@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    11 months ago

    Gold is great until you find out you can manufacture it and mass production was kept secret to avoid what happened with diamonds.

    • Jolteon@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 months ago

      The day we can mass produce gold is the day we have a post-scarcity society. Full elemental transmutation, which would be required to mass produce gold, would also eliminate virtually all resource shortages.

        • Jolteon@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          11 months ago

          Post-scarcity refers to most goods being able to be produced in abundance with minimal human labor. Even assuming that current food production fully falls under that umbrella, housing definitely does not, and it requires a lot more than just food and housing.

          • ScoffingLizard@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            6 days ago

            We already have that. Think of how much food and housing could be built with all the money and resources used building bombs and fighter jets. Think about all the resources it will take to rebuild what has been destroyed in the middle east. We need to genetically eliminate psychopathic tendencies, and then immediately outlaw further human genetic alterations for two or three generations afterwards.

            Because obviously what starts as innocent will become genetic modifications to prevent diseases, and then the remaining assholes will start saying that being gay it trans or black is a disease too. Hell, they might try to make us all blond hair and blue eyes if people get their way.