All this talk about Discord replacements plus my own experience attempting to host a Synapse has got me wondering why it seems so hard to implement voice chat.

Stupid idea: back in 2022 I got an Asterisk server working on a raspberry pi over AREDN without too much trouble. What’s stopping people from just using a PBX like that for voice chat?

  • falynns@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    5 days ago

    I have a Jitsi server hosted through a docker container that was pretty easy, and ties into Rocket Chat. Jitsi does voice and video, Rocket Chat does chat.

  • frongt@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    6 days ago

    Simple 1:1 audio stream is easy.

    Groups, screen sharing, noise canceling, NAT traversal, mobile apps, and all those extra features people have come to expect are hard.

    • lambalicious@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 days ago

      Exactly!

      people act entitled as if all that you mention was trivial and that somehow FOSS devs “owe” people, but we only see those big corpos make it happen because… well, they’re big corpos, burning VC money on makint it happen and making it happen in a controlled jail.

      • iamthetot@piefed.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 days ago

        I have honestly not seen anyone acting like they are “owed” these things by FOSS developers. We just want them.

  • early_riser@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    5 days ago

    Update: I got Mumble working without a lot of grief. Their mobile client isn’t great though. I might try Stoat.

    Federation just complicates things, as it’s just for a myself and a few friends.