Mmm, this is kind of what I’m talking about. I’m certainly not knocking Nobara as a distro or people who prefer it, but taken from their FAQ,
- Will there ever be other Desktop Environment versions? No. The ‘Official’ modified KDE release layout was designed for myself and my father out of personal preference.
- I heard Nobara breaks SELinux, is this true? No. We have completely swapped SELinux in favor of AppArmor (this is what Ubuntu and OpenSUSE use).
- Is Nobara compatible with SecureBoot? No. Nobara ships with a kernel that has been custom patched and is built and hosted on COPR.
- Can I upgrade from Fedora to Nobara using the Nobara repositories? NO. This is a big large huge NO. The Nobara install ISOs have a ton of packages that get installed which are specific to Nobara, and not installed on Fedora on fresh install.
- Just how modified is Nobara aside from what I can see? Heavily.
- This project is quite new, is it going anywhere? Is there anything to say it won’t just up stop development? Is it something that is recommendable to daily drive? (I am quite technical, and can troubleshoot my issues). As long as I am alive and using linux this project will continue. It started because I needed something both myself and my father could easily use from clean install without time consuming troubleshooting or extra package and repo installation.
It’s been around since ~2022 compared to Mint in ~2006
These are exactly the kind of points that a casual, new user would stumble across and in attempting to troubleshoot things from a Fedora perspective could trip them up severely.
My point is that casual users are already averse to making the switch and they are likely going to do ONE install and it needs to be as vanilla and stable as possible. If they turn into Linux nerds who want to distro hop later, they’ll find their way, but we need to keep things absolutely stock and simple.




I’m still not a Linux expert myself, but I’m gonna take a shot at answering this question as I understand it so maybe others can help correct me. I use Arch (btw) but the ideas should still apply,
You’ll want to use the Debian packages for anything foundational to your system. These packages are tested to work with the distro and can be considered a part of it, just ones you haven’t installed yet. This would be important for something like
bluezbluetooth (or whatever Debian uses).Aside from the space issues you mentioned, this is less important for heavy apps that sit on top of everything else, like a game. Especially if you’re on a slower moving distro like Debian this may be ideal for more updated versions.
Usually I go: distro repo (HIGH PREFERENCE), AUR (not really an option for you), Flatpak, AppImage, whatever other jank manual install is available (but only as a last resort if I really need the thing and there’s no other option, I like a tidy system). I find this offers the best stability and as someone who obsessively updates their system every day because they’re a bored tech nerd, I’ve had better stability on 3 years of Arch than I have with Windows (but that’s a low bar)