fair points but we can only go off what did happen not what might

Another thing to consider is that the MOAB is pushed out of a plane on a wooden pallette and uses a parachute and fins to drift to its target - something that would in general reduce its efficacy in hitting targets accurately and would affect lethality too

fair but I’d argue that targeting civilian infrastructure via terrorism is actually more effective in terms of disruption to targeting military targets.

the moab in 2017 killed 97 people. Not drastically far from ~20

You are confusing bombs for air strikes.Air dropped bombs account for 2% of war casualties 2015-2024, IEDs 21%, air strikes 45%.

The average deaths from any explosive ordinance is roughly 20 per “event” which may include multiple detonations and mixed ordinance.

how would you charactize the difference?

Actually 2017

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parsons_Green_train_bombing

what about something like fairphone? why is pixel better?

yeah but if your occupation is something bad like chiropractor, homeopathist, so-called gay conversion therapy practitioner, con man, tobacco lobbyist, hitman, pimp - you can say they’re bad